On Monday, deputies led Carter out of the Taunton, Massachusetts, courtroom after Moniz granted the Commonwealth’s request to revoke the keep of her sentence.
The case raised free speech questions on whether or not an individual must be held accountable by way of their phrases for another person’s actions.
“The Roy household is glad to have this facet of the case over,” the household’s legal professional, Eric S. Goldman, mentioned in a press release. The household continues to pursue a civil declare for damages and hopes to determine a fund of their son’s title to coach individuals about suicide prevention.
Carter was 17 years outdated when Roy, 18, died in July 2014. The case hinged on textual content messages between the 2 wherein Carter urged Roy to kill himself.
Prosecutors argued that Carter listened over the telephone as Roy suffocated from carbon monoxide inhalation in his pickup truck and did not notify his mother and father or authorities when he died.
Carter’s legal professionals argued that her phrases encouraging Roy’s suicide, “nevertheless distasteful to this courtroom, have been protected speech.”
“Massachusetts could be the one state to uphold an involuntary manslaughter conviction the place an absent defendant, with phrases alone, inspired one other particular person to commit suicide,” the attorneys mentioned of their movement.
Carter’s legal professional mentioned earlier this month that the ruling upholding the conviction was primarily based on a story the proof didn’t assist.
“At present’s choice stretches the regulation to assign blame for a tragedy that was not against the law. It has very troubling implications, totally free speech, due course of, and the train of prosecutorial discretion, that ought to concern us all,” lawyer Daniel Marx mentioned.
CNN’s Janet DiGiacomo and Carma Hassan contributed to this story.