Connect with us

Jeanine Pirro: Fox Information rebukes host after she questioned Ilhan Omar’s hijab

Jeanine Pirro: Fox News rebukes host after she questioned Ilhan Omar's hijab


Jeanine Pirro: Fox Information rebukes host after she questioned Ilhan Omar’s hijab

“We strongly condemn Jeanine Pirro’s feedback about Rep. Ilhan Omar,” Fox Information mentioned in an announcement. “They don’t mirror these of the community and we’ve got addressed the matter along with her instantly.”

Controversial statements about Israel by Omar, a freshman Democratic lawmaker, have landed her in sizzling water with members of each events.

Pirro advised on her Saturday present that Omar’s beliefs about Israel stem from her faith. Omar is Somali-American and a training Muslim who wears a spiritual head-covering referred to as a hijab.

“Give it some thought: Omar wears a hijab,” Pirro mentioned on her “Justice” present on Fox Information. “Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia legislation, which in itself is antithetical to the US Structure?”

Pirro was denounced by figures on each the left and the proper on Sunday.

Bret Stephens, a conservative columnist for The New York Occasions, mentioned Pirro “is a shame.” He mentioned “each wholesome democracy wants a wholesome conservative motion,” however “Fox Information has turn out to be the chief driver in making that motion intemperate, idiotic, and intolerant.”

A Fox Information staffer pushed again on Pirro’s statements. Hufsa Kamal, a producer on Fox’s “Particular Report with Bret Baier,” tweeted: “@JudgeJeanine are you able to cease spreading this false narrative that by some means Muslims hate America or ladies who put on a hijab aren’t American sufficient? You have got Muslims working on the identical community you do, together with myself.”

In her personal assertion on Sunday evening, Pirro did not apologize, saying the intention of her feedback “was to ask a query and begin a debate.”

“In fact as a result of one is Muslim doesn’t imply you do not help the Structure,” she mentioned. “I invite Rep. Omar to return on my present any time to debate all the vital points dealing with America at present.”

Omar is a longtime critic of Israel’s Palestinian insurance policies and a proponent of the Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions motion in the US to sentence Israel’s authorities insurance policies.

These stances usually are not anti-Semitic. However Omar has made a number of statements about Israel over the previous few months that echo frequent anti-Semitic expressions about twin allegiances, Jewish cash and energy.

For instance, she questioned why it’s acceptable for supporters of Israel “to push for allegiance to a international nation.” In response to journalist Glenn Greenwald’s tweet about politicians’ help of Israel, Omar replied, “It is all concerning the Benjamins child.” And in response to a query about who she believes pays American politicians to be pro-Israel, Omar responded “AIPAC!” refering to the pro-Israel foyer group.
After Omar’s newest controversial assertion about Israel supporters, the Home of Representatives on Thursday handed a decision broadly condemning hate and intolerance, together with anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim discrimination.

“We’re tremendously proud to be a part of a physique that has put forth a condemnation of all types of bigotry together with anti-Semitism, racism, and white supremacy,” mentioned Omar in a joint assertion with fellow Democratic Congressmen Rashida Tlaib and Andre Carson — all three of the Muslim members of the US Congress.

“At a time when extremism is on the rise, we should explicitly denounce non secular intolerance of every kind and acknowledge the ache felt by all communities,” they mentioned. “Our nation is having a troublesome dialog and we consider that is nice progress.”

Pirro’s query about Omar’s allegiances are just like Omar’s questions on Israel supporters’ allegiances: As Omar requested why it’s acceptable for Individuals to be pro-Israel, Pirro questioned how a Muslim may comply with Islamic non secular legislation and American constitutional legislation on the identical time.

Sharia legislation refers to a set of ideas that govern the ethical and non secular lives of Muslims. Muslims’ adherence to Sharia varies in the US and around the globe. As with all main religions, students have interpreted the Quran and different non secular texts in myriad methods, and Muslims from completely different sects, areas and international locations observe in a different way and with various levels of observance.

Non secular garb, together with hijabs, habits, yarmulkes and different adornments, are protected speech in the US. Pirro’s feedback echo a standard anti-Islamic perception that Muslims have allegiances to Sharia legislation over American legislation.

Supply hyperlink

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More in Style

To Top